Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H. & Järvelä, S. The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: a systematic review of research. TechTrends 66 (4), 616–630 (2022).
Lindner, A., Romeike, R., Jasute, E. & Pozdniakov, S. (eds) Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence. 12th International conference on informatics in schools,Situation, evaluation and perspectives, ISSEP; (2019).
Lameras, P. & Arnab, S. Power to the teachers: an exploratory review on artificial intelligence in education. Information 13 (1), 14 (2021).
Tan, X., Cheng, G. & Ling, M. H. Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: a systematic review. Computers Education: Artif. Intell. 8, 100355 (2025).
Fakhar, H., Lamrabet, M., Echantoufi, N., El Khattabi, K. & Ajana, L. Artificial intelligence from teachers’ perspectives and understanding: Moroccan study. Int. J. Inform. Educ. Technol. 14 (6), 856–864 (2024).
Wogu, I. A. P. et al. Artificial intelligence, artificial teachers and the fate of learners in the 21st century education sector: implications for theory and practice. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 119 (16), 2245–2259 (2018).
Al Darayseh, A. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: science teachers’ perspective. Computers Education: Artif. Intell. 4, 100132 (2023).
Holmes, W. & Miao, F. Guidance for generative AI in education and research (Unesco Publishing, 2023).
Chen, L., Chen, P. & Lin, Z. Artificial intelligence in education: a review. IEEE access. 8, 75264–75278 (2020).
Baker, R. S. & Hawn, A. Algorithmic bias in education. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 32 (4), 1052–1092 (2022).
Corbeil, M. E. & Corbeil, J. R. Establishing trust in artificial intelligence in education. Trust, Organizations and the Digital Economy p. 49–60 (Routledge, 2021).
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A. & Valverde, P. Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. (2019).
Gartner, S. & Krašna, M. (eds) Artificial intelligence in education-ethical framework. 12th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO); 2023: IEEE. (2023).
Niu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, C. & Chen, X. The role of artificial intelligence autonomy in higher education: a uses and gratification perspective. Sustainability 16 (3), 1276 (2024).
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y. & Liu, S. Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Comput. Educ. 227, 105224 (2025).
Kasneci, E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individual Differences. 103, 102274 (2023).
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S. & Li, L. D. The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learn. Environ. 11 (1), 28 (2024).
Risko, E. F. & Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive Offloading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 (9), 676–688 (2016).
Abrami, P. C. et al. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 85 (2), 275–314 (2015).
Benhima, M. et al. Unravelling grit and motivation as predictors of english as a foreign language online learning readiness. Lang. Teach. Res. Q. 54, 433–461 (2026).
Bastani, H. et al. Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: evidence from high school mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 122 (26), e2422633122 (2025).
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y. & Ryan, R. M. Student motivation and associated outcomes: a meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16 (6), 1300–1323 (2021).
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y. & Guay, F. Pathways to student motivation: a meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Rev. Educ. Res. 92 (1), 46–72 (2022).
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychol. Bull. 136 (3), 422–449 (2010).
Senko, C. When do mastery and performance goals facilitate academic achievement? Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 59, 101795 (2019).
Fredricks, J. & McColskey, W. The measurement of student engagement: a comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. pp. 763 – 82. (2012).
Reeve, J. et al. Specialized purpose of each type of student engagement: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 37 (1), 13 (2025).
Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31 (2), 199–218 (2006).
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77 (1), 81–112 (2007).
Zhou, X., Lavicza, Z. & Chiu, T. K. F. Developing teacher AI competence: a systematic review of beliefs, professional learning, and cultural factors. Teach. Teacher Educ. 172, 105384 (2026).
Mishra, P., Warr, M. & Islam, R. TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. J. Digit. Learn. Teacher Educ. 39, 235–251 (2023).
Horn, I. S. & Campbell, S. S. Developing pedagogical judgment in novice teachers: mediated field experience as a pedagogy for teacher education. Pedagogies: Int. J. 10 (2), 149–176 (2015).
Horn, I. Developing pedagogical judgment in novice teachers: mediated field experience as a pedagogy for teacher education. Pedagogies. 10, 149-176 (2015).
Eedelouei, S. Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: a systematic review. Teach. Teacher Educ. 171, 105333 (2026).
Prilop, C. N. et al. Generative AI in teacher education: educators’ perceptions of transformative potentials and the triadic nature of AI literacy explored through AI-enhanced methods. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. :100471 (2025).
Zhou, X., Lavicza, Z. & Chiu, T. K. Developing teacher AI competence: a systematic review of beliefs, professional learning, and cultural factors. Teach. Teacher Educ. 172, 105384 (2026).
Bergdahl, N. & Sjöberg, J. Attitudes, perceptions and AI self-efficacy in K-12 education. Computers Education: Artif. Intell. 8, 100358 (2025).
Chapman, B. L., Ross, A. S. & Petraki, E. Teacher readiness for generative AI: a theory of planned behaviour approach. Social Sci. Humanit. Open. 13, 102351 (2026).
Aldemir, T., Bicer, A., Kilinc, S., Moon, J. & Kwok, M. Exploring emergent AI-TPACK competencies in a two-week AI literacy module for preservice teachers. Teach. Teacher Educ. 168, 105231 (2025).
Ho, C. S. M. & Lee, J. C. K. From intuition to action: exploring teachers’ ethical awareness in the use of AI tools in education. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. :100502. (2025).
Song, Z., Qin, J., Jin, F., Cheung, W. M. & Lin, C-H. A case study of teachers’ generative artificial intelligence integration processes and factors influencing them. Teach. Teacher Educ. 165, 105157 (2025).
Tsao, J. Trajectories of AI policy in higher education: Interpretations, discourses, and enactments of students and teachers. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. :100496. (2025).
Alfiras, M. I. I., Emran, A. Q. & Mohamed, A. M. Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: a systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Educ. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y
Kahn, P. et al. Teacher agency and generative artifi cial intelligence: teachingin higher education as a responsive, cultural activity. Learn. Media Technol. 1–12 (2025).
Tan, S. C., Tan, Y. Y., Teo, C. L. & Yuan, G. Teachers’ professional agency in learning with AI: A case study of a generative AI-based knowledge building learning companion for teachers. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 57, 943–964. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70013
Pei, B. et al. AI literacy for educators: where to start and to what End? Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. :100550. (2026).
Panday-Shukla, P. Exploring generative artificial intelligence in teacher education. Teach. Teacher Educ. 165, 105088 (2025).
Shi, L. Assessing teachers’ generative artifi cial intelligence competencies: instrument development and validation. Educ. Inf. Technol. 30, 23365–23384. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13684-5
Cukurova, M. & Miao, F. AI competency framework for teachers (UNESCO Publishing, 2024).
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. & Young, S. L. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front. Public. Health. 6, (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns. Psychol. 34 (6), 806–838 (2006).
Biesta, G. What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. Eur. J. Educ. 50 (1), 75–87 (2015).
Barnes, M. & Tour, E. Teachers’ use of generative AI: a ‘dirty little secret’? Lang. Educ. 40 (1), 24–39 (2026).
Chen, Q., Tawilapakul, U. & Lin, A. M. Teacherness in the age of GenAI: an ethnographic exploration of pedagogical decision-making and AI integration in English language teaching. System 136, 103877 (2026).
Shen, Y., Le, H., Wang, Z. & Wang, Q. Teachers’ perceptions of value-sensitive AI in education: a case study of AI tutor. Teach. Teacher Educ. 168, 105253 (2025).
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K. & Harrison, D. A. Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Hum Decis. Process. 97 (2), 117–134 (2005).
Pantić, N. A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers Teach. 21 (6), 759–778 (2015).
Priestley, M. R., Biesta, G. & Robinson, S. Teacher agency: an ecological approach (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015).
Krushinskaia, K., Elen, J. & Raes, A. Pre-service teachers’ agency during their interactions with generative AI while designing for learning–a process view on Intelligent-TPACK. Comput. Educ. Open. 100325. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100325
Unesco AI competency framework for teachers/UNESCO: Unesco; (2024).
UNESCO. AI and education: protecting the rights of learners (UNESCO, 2025).
Gamlem, S. M., Johnston, S-K., Moltudal, S., McGrane, J. & Hopfenbeck, T. N. Generative AI in initial teacher education: exploring the alignment of perceptions and experiences of pre-service teachers and their teacher educators. Teach. Teacher Educ. 172, 105382 (2026).
Alqarni, T. M. Teachers’ perceptions of generative AI in inclusive classrooms: enhancing engagement for students with learning disabilities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 25 (1), 22 (2026).
Anouar, E. et al. Artificial intelligence impact on teachers’ professionalism: case of ChatGPT. pp. 347–359 (2025).
Khoumich, A. & Nadif, B. Revolutionizing business English instruction: adopting tailored artificial intelligence solutions for teaching English to business students. Am. J. STEM Educ. 18, 125–140 (2026).
Zemrani, M. et al. Employing generative AI applications in learning: a factor analysis of motivations and effects among moroccan university students. Am. J. STEM Educ. 24, 403–424 (2026).
Hammou, B., Abderrazak, Z., Nadif, B. & Zemrani, M. Vocabulary coverage and size in EFL critical reading. Lang. Teach. Res. Q. 47, 196–213 (2025).
El Anouar, E. M. et al. (eds) Artificial intelligence impact on teachers’ professionalism: case of ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence and Green Computing, 2026).
Pei, B., Lu, J., Zhang, Z., Tuffour, P. & Park, S. Enhancing AI literacy for educators: Where to start and to what end? Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 10, 100550 (2026).
Chiu, T. K. F., Bali, S., Tondeur, J., Howard, S. & Chan, K. K. H. Teacher education for artificial intelligence literacy through a self-determination theory perspective. Eur. J. Teacher Educ. :1–21 (2026).
Nadif, B. & Fayzullaevna, T. Unleashing potential: thriving with efficient autonomous learning. Comp. Linguistics Translation Literary Stud. 1 (3), 255–264 (2024).
Nadif, B. Unveiling the relationships between language learning strategies and academic achievement among Moroccan EFL university students. J. Interdisciplinary Stud. Educ. 14 (1), 20–37 (2025).
Bouih, A., Nadif, B. & Benattabou, D. Adult reading motivation: a factor analysis study.
Khanal, L. P., Bidari, S. & Nadif, B. Teachers’ (De)motivation during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study from Nepal. Int. J. Linguistics Literature Translation. 4 (6), 82–88 (2021).
Delvenne, J-F. Navigating GenAI in Psychology Education: Assessment Validity, Academic Integrity, and the Realities of Teaching in an AI-Rich Era. Psychol. Learn. Teach. 25, 113–126 (2026).
Shavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Rev. Educ. Res. 51 (4), 455–498 (1981).
Özdoğru, M. & Sarıer, Y. The relationship of ethical leadership with teachers’ organizational behavior, attitudes, and perceptions: a meta-analysis study. Humanit. Social Sci. Commun. 11 (1), 1–14 (2024).
Neves, M. L. G. (ed) The relationship between ethical leadership, teacher motivation, and commitment in public schools in Portugal. Frontiers in Education (Frontiers Media SA, 2025).
Bakar, S. & Tapsoba, R. Artificial intelligence in classroom teaching: prospects, challenges and framework for responsibly orchestrated mediation. Social Sci. Chron. 6, 1–21 (2026).
Goyal, N. Transforming pedagogical processes with artificial intelligence: implications for learner engagement and classroom dynamics. Asian J. Educ. Social Stud. 52 (2), 846–864 (2026).
Yusriani, S., Rekarti, E., Abdillah, S. R., Nadif, B. & Gunarto, M. Strategic leadership models for enhancing supervisory performance: a phenomenological inquiry at school Y Palembang, Indonesia. Siber J. Adv. Multidisciplinary. 3 (4), 164–174 (2026).
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. & Robinson, S. Teacher agency: an ecological approach (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2026).
Guo, S., Shi, L. & Zhai, X. Developing and validating an instrument for teachers’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in education. Educ. Inform. Technol. 30 (10), 13439–13461 (2025).
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. & Young, S. L. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front. public. health. 6, 149 (2018).
Li, K., Wang, P. & Chen, G. How can AI be integrated into teacher professional development programs? A systematic review based on an adapted technology-based learning model. Teach. Teacher Educ. 168, 105219 (2025).
Davoudi, M., Lundgren, T., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Saeedipour, Z. & Badinlou, F. The psychological flexibility in epilepsy questionnaire (PFEQ): psychometric properties of the Persian version. Epilepsy Behav. 130, 108672 (2022).
Rust, J. & Golombok, S. Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment (Routledge, 2014).
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol. Methods. 4 (1), 84–99 (1999).
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18 (1), 39–50 (1981).
Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O. & Ishola, A. M. Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Comput. Educ. open. 6, 100179 (2024).
Ding, A-C-E., Shi, L., Yang, H. & Choi, I. Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development. Comput. Educ. open. 6, 100178 (2024).
Mishra, P., Warr, M. & Islam, R. TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. J. Digit. Learn. Teacher Educ. 39 (4), 235–251 (2023).
Selwyn, N. On the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk. 10(1). (2024).
Özdoğru, M. & Sarıer, Y. The relationship of ethical leadership with teachers’ organizational behavior, attitudes, and perceptions: a meta-analysis study. Humanit. Social Sci. Commun. 11 (1), 1538 (2024).
Lan, Y-J. & Chen, N-S. Teachers’ agency in the era of LLM and generative AI. Educ. Technol. Soc. 27 (1), I–XVIII (2024).
Zhai, X. Transforming teachers’ roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: perceptions, acceptance, knowledge, and practices. J. Sci. Edu. Technol. 34 (6), 1323–1333 (2025).
Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 9 (2), 233–255 (2002).